Search found 9 matches
- Sun May 09, 1999 6:28 pm
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: An Appology to the Ladies of System Dynamics
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4765
An Appology to the Ladies of System Dynamics
Ladies! I appologize if you felt excluded from my Gentlemanly greeting. As the spouse of the first female chemical engineer to not be a librarian in DuPonts corporate engineering department among other firsts, I am quite familiar with the role of the female in a male dominated professional world. I ...
- Thu May 06, 1999 9:35 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: System Dynamics Societys Priorities
- Replies: 21
- Views: 21360
System Dynamics Societys Priorities
Gentlemen! I feel obligated to surface an alternative perspective to the role and future of system dynamics. I am troubled by the concept of System Dynamics and the System Dynamics Society defining itself in a way which isolates them from the broader (and less rigorous) community of "systems th...
- Mon Nov 09, 1998 8:45 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Reverse Modelling
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8598
Reverse Modelling
>what I am calling here reverse modelling: given the simulated faulty >output of a simulator, can one reverse the process of simulation to >identify the faulty component in the model ? (e.g.: a given physical It sounds as though you are saying, "If the model draws the right line then it must be...
- Tue Aug 11, 1998 9:56 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: ownership in the public sector
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6265
ownership in the public sector
Hi Donella! I will honor Bob Eberleins request to quiet the ownership issue and respond to you directly offline. However there is one item you raise which I would like to address within the listserve. >How can we direct more excellent systems analysis and change-expertise to= the >big systems (where...
- Sat Aug 01, 1998 9:48 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Systems from the top?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 65331
Systems from the top?
>Perhaps thats why I do agree with much of the "sell at the top" approach. >Those at the top will have the real problems which need addressing, wont >necessarily have the time to come up with a technical solution, and have >few above them to change their priorities. The problems of those i...
- Fri Jul 31, 1998 9:20 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Systems from the top?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 65331
Systems from the top?
A short addendum to Jim Hines comments to mine regarding "selling" ideas: We should probably distinguish between the "team" involved in the modeling process and the entire organization of the client. My comments regarding selling are specifically targeted at the team. I do not fe...
- Tue Jul 28, 1998 8:38 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Systems from the top?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 65331
Systems from the top?
Jim Hines identified several key issues regarding corporate-wide SD. My company responded to Van Bowen privately, sending him a copy of our most recent paper on Systemic Leverage (TM) which addresses broad corporate perspectives. It is my belief that unless we internalize the models we build and the...
- Sat Apr 11, 1998 8:40 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Some questions Re:accreditation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 26186
Some questions Re:accreditation
Hi Fabian! Fun topic! No! (in the Spanish meaning of No) My responses >Is SD a Software ?=20 No >Could SD be taught/mastered in a 5 days course? No >Is SD self contained ? No >How would be defined a competent SDist ? Inadequately. Academics have tried to make SD a science IMO. But companies and orgs...
- Wed Apr 08, 1998 10:47 pm
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Professional Accreditation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 35361
Professional Accreditation
As a first step I must comment that I echo many of the sentiments of Nelson Repenning regarding accreditation. Academically degreed SD professionals are but a very minor fragment of the practicing SD community. As a degreed "futurist" (more formally "Studies of the Future") I am ...