Search found 80 matches
- Sat Apr 06, 1996 11:40 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Recommend to Management
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4464
Recommend to Management
Jean-Pierre REVEILLES wrote: > As for any "fashion" subject we can wonder if its > fame is well-deserved. Is System Dynamics really > usefull in firm management. Do you now of real > examples? Yes, its fame is well-deserved. Fortunately, system dynamics has suffered from relatively little ...
- Sat Apr 06, 1996 9:29 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: SD success?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 17865
SD success?
Greg Scholl in SD0153 writes: " In my opinion, it is very difficult to develop strong modeling skills and a sophisticated understanding of the discipline... As a result, we have the situation that faces the discipline today: a large, diffuse group of people who all share an interest in the disc...
- Wed Apr 03, 1996 10:02 am
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Beer game
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3821
Beer game
Octavio, The step increase is the classic pattern and is desirable because it shows so clearly that the oscillations do not come from the input. If you change the input pattern you would want to maintain this feature (Are there any other test inputs that have this character? Maybe a ramp or a step d...
- Tue Apr 02, 1996 4:14 pm
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: SD success?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 17865
SD success?
I think (but am not sure) that Augusto Carena in message SD0137 is rquesting a satisfying answer to the question: Why hasnt the system dynamics field grown (faster). This is certainly a question that I get frequently from students and from clients. I usually offer two of explanations. First, I say t...
- Mon Apr 01, 1996 4:16 pm
- Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
- Topic: Semantics HELP! Re: "SD is not DiffEq"
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7600
Semantics HELP! Re: "SD is not DiffEq"
Re Jay Forrests posting SD0130
Jay,
I now understand what you meant by contraction. (Ed G. was faster on
the uptake than I was). I agree.
Regards,
Jim
Jay,
I now understand what you meant by contraction. (Ed G. was faster on
the uptake than I was). I agree.
Regards,
Jim