Search found 80 matches

by Jim Hines
Sat Apr 06, 1996 11:40 am
Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
Topic: Recommend to Management
Replies: 8
Views: 4464

Recommend to Management

Jean-Pierre REVEILLES wrote: > As for any "fashion" subject we can wonder if its > fame is well-deserved. Is System Dynamics really > usefull in firm management. Do you now of real > examples? Yes, its fame is well-deserved. Fortunately, system dynamics has suffered from relatively little ...
by Jim Hines
Sat Apr 06, 1996 9:29 am
Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
Topic: SD success?
Replies: 32
Views: 17865

SD success?

Greg Scholl in SD0153 writes: " In my opinion, it is very difficult to develop strong modeling skills and a sophisticated understanding of the discipline... As a result, we have the situation that faces the discipline today: a large, diffuse group of people who all share an interest in the disc...
by Jim Hines
Wed Apr 03, 1996 10:02 am
Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
Topic: Beer game
Replies: 4
Views: 3821

Beer game

Octavio, The step increase is the classic pattern and is desirable because it shows so clearly that the oscillations do not come from the input. If you change the input pattern you would want to maintain this feature (Are there any other test inputs that have this character? Maybe a ramp or a step d...
by Jim Hines
Tue Apr 02, 1996 4:14 pm
Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
Topic: SD success?
Replies: 32
Views: 17865

SD success?

I think (but am not sure) that Augusto Carena in message SD0137 is rquesting a satisfying answer to the question: Why hasnt the system dynamics field grown (faster). This is certainly a question that I get frequently from students and from clients. I usually offer two of explanations. First, I say t...
by Jim Hines
Mon Apr 01, 1996 4:16 pm
Forum: SD Mailing List Archive
Topic: Semantics HELP! Re: "SD is not DiffEq"
Replies: 14
Views: 7600

Semantics HELP! Re: "SD is not DiffEq"

Re Jay Forrests posting SD0130

Jay,

I now understand what you meant by contraction. (Ed G. was faster on
the uptake than I was). I agree.

Regards,
Jim