Hi
Joined two very simplistic models that are similar but generate different results.
the problem comes from the lookup table.
if you campare the lookups in both models they are the same in the equation tool, and in their graph.
Bu it you look at the values of the lookups in the table tool they are not the same in the runs from both models!
To summarize , the models are the same as models but not the same when you run them!
Best regards.
JJ
two imodels with no significant differences behaving differently
two imodels with no significant differences behaving differently
- Attachments
-
- essai_invest_2.mdl
- (2.59 KiB) Downloaded 123 times
-
- essai_invest.mdl
- (1.98 KiB) Downloaded 129 times
Re: two imodels with no significant differences behaving differently
#2 has the Simulate>Based On setting active, which might change the lookup.
/*
Advice to posters (it really helps us to help you)
http://www.ventanasystems.co.uk/forum/v ... f=2&t=4391
Blog: http://blog.metasd.com
Model library: http://models.metasd.com
Bookmarks: http://delicious.com/tomfid/SystemDynamics
*/
Advice to posters (it really helps us to help you)
http://www.ventanasystems.co.uk/forum/v ... f=2&t=4391
Blog: http://blog.metasd.com
Model library: http://models.metasd.com
Bookmarks: http://delicious.com/tomfid/SystemDynamics
*/
Re: two imodels with no significant differences behaving differently
Hi Tom
i have found the error. The new GUI is quite different than the previous one with constant changes. One model takes its change from a previous run;
Thank you;
JJ
i have found the error. The new GUI is quite different than the previous one with constant changes. One model takes its change from a previous run;
Thank you;
JJ