Dear Guys.
I have problems to run my simulation using Vensim.
I think all equations are correct but the result is not what I expected.
This is a simple one that I structured as a proof of concept for my research.
The variables ("Prairie Power Plant" and "Company B") should have "1" for their vulnerabilities, however, the result shows "0.21619" instead of "1.":(
You can look at this attached file.
Please let me know what I did wrong.
Thanks a lot
Daniel:(:(
Equation Problems?
Equation Problems?
- Attachments
-
- DSS_proof of concept.mdl
- (9.27 KiB) Downloaded 301 times
-
Administrator
- Super Administrator
- Posts: 4841
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 3:10 am
I would start by fixing the unit errors. I don't trust the results from any models unless they are dimensionally correct.
And it makes it very difficult to debug models where there are so many nested "if then else" statements. I would calculate the rate outside of the level, and also break up all of the nested statements.
Hope this helps.
Tony.
And it makes it very difficult to debug models where there are so many nested "if then else" statements. I would calculate the rate outside of the level, and also break up all of the nested statements.
Hope this helps.
Tony.
equations problems
Hi
It is not because there is no problem using the same unit for your levels that it is necessary right. Using the same unit must make sense, independantly of the way the model runs or the equations are written.
The corollary is that units must be built and checked independantly of the equations and preferably at the qualitative diagram level or causal loop diagram and should help equations writing the software unit checking being only an after test.
The order being causal loop diagramming plus units building for every variable or constant of the diagram and only afterwards equation building.
Regards.
JJ
It is not because there is no problem using the same unit for your levels that it is necessary right. Using the same unit must make sense, independantly of the way the model runs or the equations are written.
The corollary is that units must be built and checked independantly of the equations and preferably at the qualitative diagram level or causal loop diagram and should help equations writing the software unit checking being only an after test.
The order being causal loop diagramming plus units building for every variable or constant of the diagram and only afterwards equation building.
Regards.
JJ
-
Administrator
- Super Administrator
- Posts: 4841
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 3:10 am
If you start by working out the rate outside of the level equation, you will see that the level is being calculated correctly.Originally posted by Daniel
Thanks a lot.
I'll look at the unit errors.
By the way, I used "Level of Vulnerability" for all stock variables and other stock variables, such as Levee A, Levee B, and Community A, seemed to be okay because they result correctly.
I don't know how I handle the units. Is it too long?
IF THEN ELSE(creek water flood stage=1, 1, IF THEN ELSE(vulnerability from lb to ppp=1, 1, IF THEN ELSE(FUNCTIONAL DEFECTS OF PPP=1, 1, IF THEN ELSE(DETERIORATION OF PPP=1, 1, (PRECIPITATION/3+creek water flood stage+FUNCTIONAL DEFECTS OF PPP+DETERIORATION OF PPP+vulnerability from lb to ppp
)/5))))
Does calculate correctly to 1 at t=1, but you will not see the effect in the level until t=2. And if you run until t=2, you will have a value of 1.21619, as you are not draining the level.
You might also want to have a look at
http://www.public.asu.edu/~kirkwood/sysdyn/VenPLE.pdf
If you build the "Savings", "Interest" and "interest rate" model on page 23 and look at the resulting numbers, that should demonstrate why you are not seeing what you expect to see in this model.
Tony.