Diffusion models. Knowledge & Tools
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 1996 7:00 pm
Hello Everyone:
People asked me about the use of biological models to compare
the behaviour of business system dynamics.
At this moment I am preparing a paper about it, to present in
the SD 96, and perhaps, with the permision of technological
witches (=problems), it would be in a short time in the Virtual
Proceedings Papers, ...
Until this moment, I can give a few references of bibliography:
English:
Vijay Mahajan , Eitan Muller. Review Technological Forecasting
Social Change Vol. 50 N3. NORTH HOLLAND
French:
Andre de Palma, Jean -Jacques Droesbeque, Claude Lefevre.
Modeles de diffusion en marketing PRESSES UNIVERSITAIRES
DE FRANCE.
Spanish:
Silvio Martinez Vicente, Alberto Requena: Dinamica de Sistemas.
Alianza Editorial
Another references, others authors, with papers, studies, models
about the diffusion phenomena:
Lotka & Volterra.
James M. Lyneis: A dynamic model of Technology Diffusion. SD Conferen-
ce 1.993.
Robert L. Eberlein: User s Guide of VENSIM software.
I hope yours news.
In other order of things:
I agree with the comments of Ed Gallaher :
The first need to make models is to know the better as possible the
system dynamic. This knowledge is gotten by different ways:
Data historic
Data of others countries, enterprises, systems,...
Expertise opinion: delphi methoda: To listen to the expertise people.
...
Other similar models: Biological <----> social, new services, diffusion models,...
Glass ball (:-))
After the harvest and analysis, to summary and to translate to diagrams,
figures, and equations. At this moment is necessary a good tool (soft)
that helps in our work.
But the tool, the model builder, is auxialary, in the steps:
Knowledge ----> Analysys -----> Summary -----> Organization -----> TOOL
As better is each step, better will be the final model.
Antonio Barron
barron@met01.tesa.es
People asked me about the use of biological models to compare
the behaviour of business system dynamics.
At this moment I am preparing a paper about it, to present in
the SD 96, and perhaps, with the permision of technological
witches (=problems), it would be in a short time in the Virtual
Proceedings Papers, ...
Until this moment, I can give a few references of bibliography:
English:
Vijay Mahajan , Eitan Muller. Review Technological Forecasting
Social Change Vol. 50 N3. NORTH HOLLAND
French:
Andre de Palma, Jean -Jacques Droesbeque, Claude Lefevre.
Modeles de diffusion en marketing PRESSES UNIVERSITAIRES
DE FRANCE.
Spanish:
Silvio Martinez Vicente, Alberto Requena: Dinamica de Sistemas.
Alianza Editorial
Another references, others authors, with papers, studies, models
about the diffusion phenomena:
Lotka & Volterra.
James M. Lyneis: A dynamic model of Technology Diffusion. SD Conferen-
ce 1.993.
Robert L. Eberlein: User s Guide of VENSIM software.
I hope yours news.
In other order of things:
I agree with the comments of Ed Gallaher :
The first need to make models is to know the better as possible the
system dynamic. This knowledge is gotten by different ways:
Data historic
Data of others countries, enterprises, systems,...
Expertise opinion: delphi methoda: To listen to the expertise people.
...
Other similar models: Biological <----> social, new services, diffusion models,...
Glass ball (:-))
After the harvest and analysis, to summary and to translate to diagrams,
figures, and equations. At this moment is necessary a good tool (soft)
that helps in our work.
But the tool, the model builder, is auxialary, in the steps:
Knowledge ----> Analysys -----> Summary -----> Organization -----> TOOL
As better is each step, better will be the final model.
Antonio Barron
barron@met01.tesa.es