Loop counter: Is there a known bug?
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:46 am
Hello,
I was wondering whether there are any known bugs related to the Loops counter feature in Vensim (I'm using Vensim Professional for Windows Version 6.3D (x32)).
The reason I ask has to do with the two models attached. The two models are identical, except for one link. In version 2, I have added one additional link (from variable 'growth in real house prices' to variable 'change in real private rents'. See View No. 4).
When I compare the number of loops going through the stock variable Real House Prices (in View 1), version 1 shows 640 loops but version 2, in which 'Real House Prices' is linked to 'Real Private Rents', shows only 10 loops. I would expect that adding this additional link would actually increase the number of feedback loops in the model, or at least certainly not reduce them. However, the number of feedbacks going through Real House Prices is suddenly reduced by a factor of 64!
This seems like perhaps a bug to me. It would be great if you could please have a look.
Many thanks,
Kaveh.
I was wondering whether there are any known bugs related to the Loops counter feature in Vensim (I'm using Vensim Professional for Windows Version 6.3D (x32)).
The reason I ask has to do with the two models attached. The two models are identical, except for one link. In version 2, I have added one additional link (from variable 'growth in real house prices' to variable 'change in real private rents'. See View No. 4).
When I compare the number of loops going through the stock variable Real House Prices (in View 1), version 1 shows 640 loops but version 2, in which 'Real House Prices' is linked to 'Real Private Rents', shows only 10 loops. I would expect that adding this additional link would actually increase the number of feedback loops in the model, or at least certainly not reduce them. However, the number of feedbacks going through Real House Prices is suddenly reduced by a factor of 64!
This seems like perhaps a bug to me. It would be great if you could please have a look.
Many thanks,
Kaveh.