Meadows intervention

This forum contains all archives from the SD Mailing list (go to http://www.systemdynamics.org/forum/ for more information). This is here as a read-only resource, please post any SD related questions to the SD Discussion forum.
Locked
Andrew Jones
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 3:39 am

Meadows intervention

Post by Andrew Jones »

Dear SD folks:

I think the article being sought is "Places to Intervene in a System (In
Increasing Order of Effectiveness" by Donella Meadows, in Whole Earth
Review, Winter 1997.

It has a ten-point build-up of general leverage points (numbers, stocks and
flows, negative loops, positive loops, information flows, system rules,
self-organization, system goals, paradigm, transcending paradigms) -- a more
detailed classification than the events/behavior/structure order I usually
use. It has many anecdotes about successful and unsuccessful attempts to
change system behavior, written in Danas accessible style.

I keep a few extra copies of it around to send to people who are seeking a
simple introduction to system dynamics and systems thinking. If you cant
find the Whole Earth Review anywhere (most libraries should have it) and
want a copy, write me and Ill send you one unless my stock is empty.

Sincerely,

Drew Jones
System Dynamics Consultant

Andrew Jones (704) 236-0884 (w)
118 Coleman Avenue (704) 252-1266 (h)
Asheville NC 28801-1304 apjones@cheta.net (e)
USA
"Heinzen Manufacturing, Inc."
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 3:39 am

Meadows intervention

Post by "Heinzen Manufacturing, Inc." »

Bradd Libby
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 3:39 am

Meadows intervention

Post by Bradd Libby »

======
From: Jeff Bullock <jbullock@earthlink.net>:
Im looking for an article I saw, written by Donella Meadows, on systems
intervention.
======

Jeff,

I have no information to provide regarding the article in Whole Earth
specifically, but an interesting early version of Donella Meadows
list "Places to Intervene in a System" is available in an article in
the Rocky Mountain Institutes newsletter on their website,
http://www.rmi.org

The article I refer to specifically is called "The Tao of Systems" and
is available at http://www.rmi.org/newsletters/96sumnl/hunter.html
It wasnt written by Donella Meadows, but instead by a woman named
Hunter Lovins, who I will speak more about in a moment.

Another article that may be of interest to SDers on that website is
called "Blame it on the System" and is available at http://www.rmi.org/
newsletters/97sumnl/system.html. It discusses the economics of
unsustainability...or the unsustainabilty of economics, depending
on the way you look at it...

The Rocky Mountain Institute is an environmental organization founded
by the Lovins, Hunter and Amory, a long-time critic of US energy policy
and advocate for *profitable* environmental friendliness. (Perhaps
Amory Lovins is best known for negawatts, the concept of allowing
saved electricity, in this case, or water, or air, etc., to be traded
as a commodity.) The Institutes main concerns these days it seems,
judging from their website, are with hypercars (light weight,
zero-emission vehicles - Additionally, there is an article about this topic
on Mike Radzickis Sustainable Solutions website as well) and their
consulting services (including a Systems Group on Forests and another group
concerned with water management that apparently uses SD to some degree in
their work) - so if youre interested in those topics, Jeff, you might do
well to check the site out.

Even if you find the Whole Earth article, or receive another copy of
the list that was posted to this mailing group last July (give or take
a month), I would suggest looking at the version posted on the RMI site
as it shows that the list is a living document which has been revised
over the past few years.
The list originally contained 8 points, but was upped to about
12 by the time it reached this mailing list. What I find most surprising
about the RMI version is that the Number 2 item was change the *people*
who make the rules - a very non-SD/ST reccommedation, in my personal
opinion. I think one of most important lessons SD teaches is that it is the
structure of the system and the decision-making paradigm of those charge
that are the primary determinants of a systems behavior, not the people
in charge themselves. It should be noted that this item was suspiciously
absent from the version sent to this mailing list last summer.

Seeing the RMI newsletter added a third dimension,
development over time, to my perception of Dr Meadows list and I would
reccommend a long visit at the RMIs website or a search for the work
of Amory and Hunter Lovins at your local library or favorite web search
engine to anyone interested in these topics.

Happy hunting -
Sincerely,
Bradd Libby.
(bradd@wpi.edu)
Locked