Page 1 of 1

Chaos, DT, Quantum theory, SD-paradigm

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:18 am
by Nijland lukkenaer planet.nl
Posted by Nijland <lukkenaer@planet.nl>
To the members of the SD list,

I renewed my membership to this mailing list some days ago,
and I hope to have a fruitful discussion with some of you about the following problem.


I constructed (some ten years ago),

a simple model of the dynamics of the orbit of the planet Mercury,

according to the theory of relativity.

The system dynamics model has two level variables

(spatial position and velocity) and two feedback loops (a positive and a negative loop).



The behaviour of my ""sun-planet"" model exhibited the rosette pattern,

as expected from the theory of relativity.

I did some experiments with different values of the basic parameters,

and with different values of the solution interval (dt).

Choosing the value of dt (too) large, produces very irregular patterns.

I interpreted such behaviour

as an artefact originating from a too large solution interval (delta t).

In some models (e.g. the population dynamical “May-model”)

I found that chaotic behaviour may be abolished

by reducing the solution interval dt.



Now, 10 years later, I am reflecting again on this matter.

With some alterations my “sun-planet model” may also be applied to

the dynamics of electrons around protons in an atom.



Some questions arising are,



Might it be possible to provoke

deterministic chaos in a system dynamics model of the atom?

Especially if more than one electron are involved?



Might it be possible to interpret (explain) any observed ""deterministic chaos""

in such a model, as ""quantum behaviour"" of electrons in atoms (in the sense of the quantum theory)?



If an absolute minimum time interval exists (dependent on the constant of Planck??),

then simulations of any phenomena on micro or nano scale,

with a smaller solution interval (dt) than this minimum time interval are not realistic.

If simulations (for micro phenomena) with such a minimum solution interval would show deterministic chaos,

and this chaos would show quantum characteristics

(regularities in the probability distributions of the outcomes),

and these statistics would correlate with the empirical statistics found in atoms

(position distribution of electrons),

then quantum theory might be explained by classical physics ??



Is there (introductory) literature about system dynamics as a

philosophical paradigm for unification of other paradigms (theory of relativity and quantum theory)?



I hope that anyone of this list can give me some useful direct information,

or literature references about the questions posed above?



Geert Nijland,

Renkum, The Netherlands



Posted by Nijland <lukkenaer@planet.nl>
posting date Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:31:07 +0100

Chaos, DT, Quantum theory, SD-paradigm

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:34 pm
by George A Simpson gsimpso4 csc.co
Posted by George A Simpson <gsimpso4@csc.com>


This is a fascinating thought on a topic I have been thinking about for
some time.

However the idea would need to overcome some barriers to be workable:

Electron distributions are not like planetary ones - in that they are
spherical, not circular (for the s-shell).

Perhaps chaos can explain this - but it must do so for the hydrogen atom -
which has only a single electron.

Also, a characteristic of chaotic orbits is that they tend to fling things
off to infinity, and electrons don't seem to escape from atoms.

The deeper problems of why conjugate variables exhibit Heisenberg
uncertainty (position + momentum, energy + time) and how particles
interfere with themselves in the double-slit experiments also suggest that
we're going to need a deeper understanding.

It seems that the future exists in a superposition of all possibilities,
until we make a decision, when one of these possibilities is selected.
And, according to the many-worlds interpretation, the universe branches
along each of the possibilities - leading to a phenomenal explosion of
branches each second.

I think this issue will require more than SD to tackle.

..george...

Dr. George Simpson, Principal Consultant, CSC
CSC Alliance: Performance Engineer
tel +44 1252 813930 mobile 07814 623518
email: gsimpso4@csc.comPosted by George A Simpson <gsimpso4@csc.com>
posting date Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:23:10 +0000

Chaos, DT, Quantum theory, SD-paradigm

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:15 am
by Jean-Jacques Laublé jean-jacques
Posted by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Jacques_Laubl=E9?= <jean-jacques.lauble@wanadoo.fr>
-- It seems that the future exists in a superposition of all possibilities,
-- until we make a decision, when one of these possibilities is selected.
-- And, according to the many-worlds interpretation, the universe branches
-- along each of the possibilities - leading to a phenomenal explosion of
-- branches each second.



At the condition that the decision is not dictated by past causalities and

is not part of the world that we want to predict.

In that case of complete determinism there would be only one future
completely

determined by the past and decisions would only be illusions.



J.J. Laublé Allocar
Posted by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Jacques_Laubl=E9?= <jean-jacques.lauble@wanadoo.fr>
posting date Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:43:30 +0100

Chaos, DT, Quantum theory, SD-paradigm

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 11:21 am
by Nijland lukkenaer planet.nl
Posted by Nijland <lukkenaer@planet.nl>
Questions and hypothesis to be discussed with George Simpson.



Simpson wrote: Electron distributions are not like planetary ones - in that
they are
spherical, not circular (for the s-shell).

- Are spherical orbits different from circular ones, in that they
cannot exhibit chaotic behaviour ??



Simpson wrote: Also, a characteristic of chaotic orbits is that they tend to
fling things off to infinity, and electrons don't seem to escape from atoms.

- Electrons may escape from protons, leaving behind ions (with
positive charge) ??



Some new thoughts for discussion:

- In feedback systems, which exhibit chaotic behaviour,
parameter-ranges exist within which different types of (visibly) regular
fluctuating types of behaviour exist, in between ""stable behaviour"" and
""chaotic behaviour"". The different fluctuation-types have different
amplitudes and frequencies. The transition from one modality to the next
(when changing a parameter) is rather abrupt, and give the impression of
discontinuous transitions. The transitions may be said to have a quantum
character ??



- Positivist philosophers defined ""atomic facts"" as the basic
entities of reality. Any feedback between ""atomic facts"" must be of a
secondary character then. The philosopher Whitehead defined ""actual
occasions"" as the basic entities of reality. These ""actual occasions"" of
Whitehead may be said to have a feedback structure, and might be called
""atomic feedbacks"". So feedback is the basic unit of reality. These ""atomic
feedbacks"" (or combinations of them) may exhibit chaotic behaviour, because
the smallest solution interval (dt) existing in the ""cosmic computer"" is too
large for a stable behaviour. ??



- Do you see any novelty or perspectives in these thoughts ??



- Maybe SD cannot solve the problem,

but it may give another theoretic perspective on it,

and so facilitate formation of new theories.



Best regards,

Geert Nijland
Posted by Nijland <lukkenaer@planet.nl>
posting date Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:38:54 +0100

Chaos, DT, Quantum theory, SD-paradigm

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 3:06 pm
by Ray Joseph rtjoseph ev1.net
Posted by ""Ray Joseph"" <rtjoseph@ev1.net>
Sorry,

As a chemist, I never felt that the behaviour of electrons in atomic
orbitals was chaotic.

But what is this preception thing? If I see this thing in some particular
fashion and build a model that reproduces the behavior - I will feel good.
If if predicts a new behavour which proves to be valid, I will be extatic!
If it fails, I will love that I was not afraid to experiment.

Ray
Posted by ""Ray Joseph"" <rtjoseph@ev1.net>
posting date Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:29:02 -0600